🔗 Share this article

Avril Coleridge-Taylor constantly felt the weight of her family legacy. As the offspring of the celebrated composer Samuel Coleridge-Taylor, one of the most famous UK artists of the early 20th century, her identity was cloaked in the long shadows of bygone eras.

The First Recording

Earlier this year, I sat with these shadows as I got ready to make the first-ever recording of her 1936 piano concerto. With its emotional harmonies, heartfelt tunes, and valiant rhythms, this piece will provide new listeners deep understanding into how the composer – an artist in conflict born in 1903 – envisioned her existence as a female composer of color.

Shadows and Truth

However about legacies. It requires time to adjust, to perceive forms as they really are, to separate fact from misinterpretation, and I felt hesitant to address the composer’s background for a while.

I deeply hoped her to be a reflection of her father. Partially, she was. The idyllic English tones of parental inspiration can be observed in numerous compositions, such as From the Hills (1934) and Sussex Landscape (1940). But you only have to examine the titles of her family’s music to see how he identified as not only a champion of UK romantic tradition as well as a advocate of the Black diaspora.

It was here that Samuel and Avril appeared to part ways.

American society assessed the composer by the mastery of his art instead of the colour of his skin.

Parental Heritage

During his studies at the Royal College of Music, her father – the offspring of a African father and a British mother – started to lean into his background. At the time the poet of color this literary figure came to London in the late 19th century, the young musician eagerly sought him out. He adapted this literary work to music and the next year used the poet’s words for an opera, Dream Lovers. This was followed by the choral piece that made him famous: Hiawatha’s Wedding Feast.

Based on Henry Wadsworth Longfellow’s The Song of Hiawatha, this composition was an international hit, especially with the Black community who felt vicarious pride as American society assessed his work by the brilliance of his music rather than the his background.

Principles and Actions

Recognition did not temper Samuel’s politics. In 1900, he was present at the pioneering African conference in the UK where he made the acquaintance of the African American intellectual the renowned Du Bois and observed a range of talks, including on the mistreatment of the Black community there. He was an activist to his final days. He sustained relationships with early civil rights leaders like Du Bois and this leader, gave addresses on ending discrimination, and even engaged in dialogue on issues of racism with the US President during an invitation to the White House in the early 1900s. Regarding his compositions, reminisced Du Bois, “he established his reputation so prominently as a composer that it will long be remembered.” He succumbed in the early 20th century, at 37 years old. Yet how might her father have reacted to his daughter’s decision to travel to this country in the that decade?

Conflict and Policy

“Offspring of Renowned Musician expresses approval to S African Bias,” appeared as a heading in the Black American publication Jet magazine. This policy “struck me as the correct approach”, she informed Jet. Upon further questioning, she revised her statement: she was not in favor with apartheid “in principle” and it “ought to be permitted to run its course, guided by benevolent residents of diverse ethnicities”. If Avril had been more aligned to her family’s principles, or from the US under segregation, she could have hesitated about apartheid. However, existence had sheltered her.

Heritage and Innocence

“I possess a English document,” she stated, “and the authorities did not inquire me about my ethnicity.” So, with her “light” skin (as Jet put it), she traveled alongside white society, buoyed up by their admiration for her late father. She delivered a lecture about her family’s work at the educational institution and conducted the broadcasting ensemble in Johannesburg, featuring the bold final section of her composition, titled: “Dedicated to my Father.” Even though a confident pianist personally, she avoided playing as the soloist in her work. On the contrary, she always led as the conductor; and so the apartheid orchestra followed her lead.

The composer aspired, in her own words, she “could introduce a shift”. But by 1954, the situation collapsed. When government agents learned of her Black ancestry, she had to depart the nation. Her British passport offered no defense, the diplomatic official recommended her departure or be jailed. She returned to England, deeply ashamed as the extent of her innocence was realized. “The realization was a difficult one,” she expressed. Increasing her embarrassment was the release in 1955 of her controversial discussion, a year after her forced leaving from the country.

A Common Narrative

While I reflected with these shadows, I sensed a recurring theme. The narrative of being British until it’s challenged – that brings to mind Black soldiers who defended the British in the World War II and made it through but were refused rightful benefits. And the Windrush generation,