🔗 Share this article

The count of reserved seats for Māori representatives on New Zealand councils is set to be cut by more than half, after a controversial law change that required local governments to put the future of hard-won Māori seats to a popular referendum.

Historical Context on Indigenous Representation

Indigenous electoral districts, which can include one or more councillors depending on local population numbers, were established in 2001 to provide Indigenous voters the option to elect a assured Indigenous council member in municipal and provincial governments. Originally, local governments were only able to create a Māori ward by first submitting it to a community referendum in their area. Communities frequently spent years generating community backing and urging their councils to create Māori wards.

Legislative Shifts and Government Actions

To remedy the issue, the former administration permitted local councils to set up a Māori ward without initially mandating them to put it to a popular ballot.

However, this year, the right-wing coalition government overturned the policy, stating communities ought to determine whether to introduce Indigenous representation.

Voting Outcomes

The coalition’s law change required local authorities that had established a ward under Labour’s rules to conduct decisive public votes concurrently with the local body elections, which concluded on 11 October. Of 42 councils taking part in the public vote, 17 decided to keep their wards, and twenty-five to disestablish theirs – showing many regions opposed to reserved Indigenous seats.

These outcomes represented “a vital step in restoring community self-determination.”

Critics nevertheless have condemned the government’s law change as “discriminatory” and “against Indigenous interests”. After assuming power, the current administration has implemented extensive reversals to measures designed to improve Māori health, wellbeing and representation. Officials has stated it wants to end “race-based” policies, and says it is dedicated to enhancing results for Māori and all New Zealanders.

Urban-Rural Divide

The results of the referendums were divided down urban-rural lines – most cities mandated to hold referendums supported Māori wards, while rural regions leaned strongly towards removing them.

“It's unfortunate for the Indigenous seats that had only just come in – they’re only just starting to hit their stride.”

Voter Turnout and Criticism

This year’s local government elections registered the smallest electoral participation in over three decades, with under one-third of citizens casting a vote, leading to demands for reform.

The process had been “a mockery”.

Comparative Treatment

Councils are able to establish different electoral districts – such as rural wards – without initially mandating a community ballot. The different conditions applied to Māori wards suggested the administration was targeting Indigenous inclusion.

“Ultimately, they were unsuccessful. Many communities have expressed strong opposition.”

This remark referred to the 17 areas that voted to retain their wards.